Reading guide · Products
Same company name. Different named products.
Before combining two Prop 65 search results, compare their AG numbers and the exact product descriptions. A company name alone does not identify the product covered by a notice.
Official records checked . These examples are historical filings, not a live feed.
Two filings, one shared company field
Both official records list Ahven LLC dba Carolindica under “Alleged Violators” and June 19, 2026 under “Date Filed.” Their “Source” fields differ:
AG number 2026-02898
Bud & Blossom Pre-Rolls
Exact wording of the official “Source” field.
AG number 2026-02899
Carolindica Cookies & Cream THC Chocolate Bars
Exact wording of the official “Source” field.
Both also list delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. as “Noticing Party,” and Entorno Law, LLP as “Plaintiff Attorney.” Shared fields do not erase the different AG numbers or product descriptions.
A repeatable comparison
- Keep the AG number beside each product. Copy the source wording before shortening a name for your notes.
- Check date, chemical and parties separately. A match in these fields is useful context, not proof that records are duplicates.
- Open each official entry and its notice document. Use the document for scope and later entries for developments; do not transfer an outcome from one AG number to another.
These examples identify two named products. They do not establish corporate relationships, a violation, or coverage of every product sold by the company. The archive copies for both notices were captured June 26, 2026; the source check above does not refresh the whole archive.